Comparisons

Fluid Chat versus everyone else.

Four head-to-heads, written the way you'd want a friend to write them — including the cases where the other tool is the right answer. Because a comparison page where the author wins every row is not a comparison page.

Architecture and pricing models, not feature-count theatre.

The whole field

Five tools, nine rows that matter.

Notice that Fluid loses three of these outright. That is what an honest table looks like.

 Fluid ChatMattermostRocket.ChatZulipSlack
Open sourceYesYesYesYesNo
Self-hostableYesYesYesYesNo
DatabasePostgresPostgres / MySQLMongoDBPostgres
Unlimited history freeYesSelf-hostedSelf-hostedSelf-hostedNo (~90 days)
Per-seat pricingNonePaid tiersPaid tiersCloud tiersYes
Admin features gatedNoneSomeSomeSomeYes
Voice / videoNoYesYesIntegrationsYes
Native mobile appsNoYesYesYesYes
SSO / SAMLNoPaidPaidPaidPaid

Competitor details are summarised from each project’s public documentation and pricing pages and can change — check the source before making a decision on ours. Slack is a trademark of Salesforce; Mattermost, Rocket.Chat and Zulip are trademarks of their respective owners. Fluid Chat is an independent project and is not affiliated with any of them.

Comparisons are easier when nothing is hidden.

Every feature Fluid has is in the free product, and every feature it lacks is listed on these pages. Start a workspace and check.